Beyond Quantum thinking/Data processing/Estimation and Data
Storage = Spectrum Processing
I don’t think people realized that when taking a photograph of a
UFO I provide a percentage ratio for it being what it is and a
possibility of it being something else. This helps the viewer to
think and clarify there views on the object. This follows the
ideas of logic beyond standard logic, as well provides a better
out look than just the 0 and 1 and the True and False of the
logic of yes and no of standard computer systems.
I recently made a friend, who had seen a sighting personally in
Cape Town, 6 years ago on estimate, who eye witnessed the event,
from his words he described it to being silver-ish, glowing like
a star and had a sort of disk shape. Many people besides him
phoned into the radio to report the sighting. Unfortunately the
DJ in a DJ booth could not see the object or did but never
studied it dismissed it as being Venus. This happens in many
cases where various data inputs and views on the object were
neglected, and finalized by the DJ that it wasn’t a ufo but
Venus. Being having authority over the air, his opinion stands
stronger than those who phoned in, yet did he ever consider the
angle or closeness to the object some of the people were? So
this is when people need to derive and plot things down and
process a data drawing of an estimate. The simple way I found
myself is to plot it from 1 to 100 and give it a % possibility
and probability. Take what they take in through there senses and
feel where it can go. Yes one can go on that many objects have
been misinterpreted as UFOs, but where they correctly analysed,
by the witness themselves and the others observing to find a
more clarified opinion ? based on a model of
probability/possibility ?
For there is never an impossibility or a true complete
possibility with most things, which results in fuzzy logic, and
not direct true/false logic, yes the fuzzy logic when something
is highly true or highly false can be estimated to a 1 or a 0,
for clarity of thought. But in some cases and scenarios it is
impossible, and could cause a lot of error on judgment of data.
Since one cannot say a definite yes or no until it’s finalized
win the number of thought. Basically it dissolves sceptism,
since sceptics can see the probability and possibility estimates
and derive there opinion from it, passively, and in time the
truth would eventually come out. Same as judging a photograph on
the web, look at it, give it a % possibility it is what the
photographer things and then a % factor of what other thing it
may be. For example, the photograph of Robben Island and Elohim
crafts, turned out poor, you could see dots and some disks. I
know for a fact personally they were there, but not all of you
were there with me. I never took them by purpose and was by
accident. And They could be other objects and Elohim were out of
sight from the camera. Hence I derived the possibility of 25%
due to quality of the photo, the 75% probability of not being
them. Taking note of shapes, and arrangements of the objects in
the air are convincing, gave them the advantage, but due to
quality and distance, they could be any other object, such as
planes, birds etc. To me they were there, but the viewer not
sure… which is something but not nothing, so it does not get
dismissed. Perhaps in the future when digital photo analyzing
technology improves, it would render the photo ratios more
balanced, and then a better judgement be made on them.
The same goes for the strange text characters that appeared on
my computer, the possibility could be that is a hardware glitch,
and then there is a possibility that it is something, since
there is never a true impossibilility.
The speed of light..
One claims that humanity would never reach the speed of light.
They have learned in physics that it is impossible due to
mathematical models, then those who have seen UFOs would
disagree with them, and have not studied physics. But then again
not all who have studied physics and not all have seen UFOs.
Since everyone’s outlook on the topic is different, may it be
thought, philosophy, experience or even mathematical models. Its
different, but there still isn’t a complete impossibility, even
when the possibility ratio is as low as 5%. Then again I have
not studied physics of light speed travel etc, but I have
experienced visitors from space. So I have an extremely high
possibility factors that Humanity can do it, but how is another
story, and I feel there may be many possible methods as well,
such as many paths of opening notepad.exe on a computer.
Here is a response from a scientist (David Menasce) who I had
been discussing with who has an excellent knowledge on physics.
“Zana, things can't travel beyond the speed of light. Light is
an electromagnetic wave, its made up of photons. Tiny little
particles, not even you can see. The velocity of an
electromagnetic wave, reduces to C, the speed of light. Velocity
of a electromagnetic wave though any medium = 1/(epsilon*mu)^0.5.
Epsilon reduces to epsilon-r and mu reduces... Read more to mu-r
in free space. In any of media, the wave slows down. Go read a
physics text book or something. Not the toilet paper of the
internet. My thumbs are getting sore from typing this on my
cell.” (Actually I want to get one)
Then again sadly he has been bound by a mathematical model which
just focuses on a portion of space which only can be seen within
that mathematical model, and not the Infinity of space. Now is
it also strange that the Laws of Physics work at our level of
existence of space and time, but in an atomic level and
astrophysics it’s different... and the laws of physics is not
obeyed, and can be considered naughty. So here you can see the
infinity of space Infinity Large and Infinity Small, and we all
exist at a very tiny position in this cyclic infinity, as
mentioned in the books on http://rael.org which only today with
large telescopes people are seeing that that the Universe isn’t
what it was imagined to be like when the earth was thought to be
flat in the middle ages. of you know of this already (Especial
Raelians who have read the messages). However there is small
minority of people who still believe the planet is flat, and the
moon landing was done in a film studio. When its so obvious you
can actually from viewing the moon shows the spherical ness of
the moon and the Earth, the way the Earth casts and shadow on
the moon, which people at that time were not as observant, and
never played with balls around artificial light sources at the
time when they were children.
Then as you know logic can be clearly analyzed this way, plotted
on a graph of the possibilities and impossibilities where there
is no prison for the data, and yes people will have there own
opinion and thought which they have the right to do, but also
leaves space for thought, study and observation and analysis.
Now some, but here from this one can derive a new way of storing
data, Data today is stored in bits of 1’s and 0’s, and Quantum
processing is being introduced with quantum processes, which
could develop towards the % ratio of processing and logic…
Now there is a leap of possibility I thought of is Spectrum
Processing. Spectrum processing is where each part of colour is
like that of a bit, basically you have the colour of the rainbow
as your storage bits. This would require a different processing
structure.
Black and white can be the most likely True (1) and most likely
Falses (0) which is used in many regular existing programs, the
standard forms of processing data logically and calculating
problems, But when you add in a whole spectrum of colour in
which each colour which could be a hexadecimal value or even
more than high definition would increase the processing power of
a Spectrum Computer. Now how would one store data, Data can be
stored as a spectrum of various colours in a 3D object, and at
the nano level of making the molecules refract each colour of
spectrum which is a data point, perhaps a quartz crystal for
example, which you could wear around your neck could contain the
information of personality and genetic structure of a person in
a spectral storage way, much more efficient than a memory stick,
including the whole planet’s books and libraries, maybe the
whole Internet... sounds impossible, but may be possible.
Spectrum Computers may at first start off with a 16 Spectrum
(which is 4 x more the processing power of a quantum computer)
and in time develop to 256, then to High definition which is all
the slightest variations of colour delicately. However, there
may be no such a computer yet, but it is possible. When
computers first came out, no one thought of quantum processes.
Lotsa Love and huggles
If you googled this page
by accident
its part of a whole site,
please enter the full site here: